FSnet Aug. 29/08 -- II
BARFBLOG: Sun
TV listeria outbreak coverage

ALBERTA:
Alta. hospitals still serving deli meats, despite
listeriosis outbreak

CANADA: Did
nursing homes ignore deli meat warnings?

BLOG:
Listeria scare overwhelms laboratories in Canada

CALGARY:
Moral of the story

OPINION:
Don't fret, we eat listeria 'all the time'

ONTARIO: Meat
of the matter

OKLAHOMA: E.
coli count keeps rising near Locust Grove

UK: 15 struck
down as E coli hits village's water supply

US: Concerns
remain as salmonella outbreak comes to an end

BLOG: Quebec
champions raw milk cheese

TEXAS:
Restaurant reports

IRELAND: An
international meeting on Cronobacter

Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: The Lactobacillus genus

Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: Streptococcus
thermophilus

Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: The Lactococcus genus

Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: Bacterial taxonomy

how to
subscribe
BARFBLOG: Sun
TV listeria outbreak coverage
29.aug.08
Ben Chapman
barblog
http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/2008/08/articles/listeria-1/sun-tv-listeria-outbreak-coverage/
I did a phone-in interview with Sun TV (Toronto) yesterday
which focused on what we can learn from the outbreak and
what consumers could do to protect themselves. Irradiation
seems to be coming up a lot in coverage and interviews that
we are doing, likely fueled by the FDA's announcement to
allow the irradiation of certain ready-to-eat leafy greens
and Health Canada's Jeff Farber saying that the government
is considering approving the irradiation of meats early next
year
(http://www.thespec.com/News/BreakingNews/article/426223).
Irradiation has been approved for certain specific
single-ingredient meats (like ground beef) in the U.S. since
1997 (http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/NEW00603.html),
with the USDA approving it's commercial use in 1999 though
it's use in deli meats is not currently approved
(http://www.meatami.com/ht/display/ArticleDetails/i/41422/pid/3669).
Last night I said that irradiation is a tool that can be
used to reduce risk and impact public health, but by no
means is a magic bullet in pathogen control.
The best part of the interview wasn't the content
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waj7-9A-AVw) but was my huge
head appearing over Janette Luu's shoulder as if I was going
to eat her Janette, probably sensing some impending doom
appears to be leaning away from my picture as well.
Below
(http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/2008/08/articles/listeria-1/sun-tv-listeria-outbreak-coverage/)
is the original pic where the headshot came from. I think it
is less creepy.
ALBERTA:
Alta. hospitals still serving deli meats, despite
listeriosis outbreak
28.aug.08
Vancouver Sun
Michelle Lang, Canwest News Service
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=64295a95-8839-4928-8480-d0b1287d3cf8
CALGARY -- Several Alberta hospitals and nursing homes are
still serving deli meats to patients, despite
recommendations from Health Canada that the elderly and
people with compromised immune systems avoid cold cuts
because of their risk of contracting listeriosis.
The Calgary Health Region, Edmonton-based Capital Health and
two continuing care organizations acknowledged they have
cold cuts on their menus, in the midst of a deadly national
outbreak of the bacterial disease.
In other provinces, at least two cases linked to the
listeriosis outbreak occurred in patients who ate tainted
cold cuts while in hospital.
Alberta hospitals and long-term care centres say they have
removed the recalled Maple Leaf Foods products. Several
facilities, however, are continuing to serve other deli
meats to patients, with the exception of pregnant women.
In Calgary, health region officials said the outbreak may
lead them to reconsider the practice.
"This is a concerning event for everyone," said Dr. Judy
MacDonald, the region's deputy medical officer of health.
"Something like this would give us the opportunity to relook
at it and see if it's something we need to change."
Long before the current scare, Health Canada recommended
pregnant women, the elderly and immuno-compromised patients
avoid cold cuts because they have a heightened risk of
developing listeriosis, which can be fatal in 20 percent of
cases.
"For at-risk populations, we have given the advice that
these deli meats may be high risk foods," Dr. Jeff Farber of
Health Canada said Thursday, noting that thoroughly heating
cold cuts can address the problem.
At least one expert argued hospitals and old age homes
should consider taking the products off their menus, unless
the facilities start cooking the cold cuts.
"They should be careful . . . when the immune system is
compromised, you can't give them cold cuts," said Dr. Subash
Sad, a microbial immunologist for the National Research
Council.
But Health Canada has never recommended health facilities
stop serving deli meats, noting that hospitals are a
provincial responsibility.
In Calgary, two nursing home operators, Carewest and Bethany
Care Society, confirmed some of their facilities serve cold
meats.
"If public health says not to serve cold cuts to seniors,
then we wouldn't," said Janice Kennedy, a Bethany
spokeswoman. "We're still meeting requirements."
Capital Health officials said their hospitals still serve
cold meats, but the organization will consider whether the
practice should continue as part of ongoing food safety
reviews.
CANADA: Did
nursing homes ignore deli meat warnings?
28.aug.08
National Post
Tom Blackwell
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=753991
Amid the debate over the role of Canada's meat-inspection
system in the listeriosis outbreak, a much simpler question
about the affair is emerging: Could the death toll have been
slashed simply by keeping deli meats off nursing home menus?
A background article posted on the Health Canada Web site
almost three years ago noted that the elderly are among the
most susceptible to the disease, and that such high-risk
people should avoid "non-dried" deli meats, among other
foods. And yet it appears most of the outbreak's victims
were senior citizens living in long-term care facilities,
apparently served the kind of cold cuts linked to the
bacteria's recent spread.
Some experts say banning such food in nursing homes and
hospitals would be an overreaction to a rare event, and
ignores other food, like milk and even cabbage, that has
been linked to listeria in the past. Others say institutions
should have acted sooner.
"The outbreak we're going through right now is more or less
a fluke," said Dr. Michel LaverdiËre, past president of the
Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Canada. "This was a break in the food preparation. I don't
think we should go overboard and say that all of those
prepared foods should be banned from old-age homes."
Health Canada's November, 2005, article on listeria and food
safety lists pregnant women and their fetuses or newborn
children, the elderly, and people with weakened immune
systems as the most at risk to develop serious illness if
they come in contact with the bacteria.
It suggests a number of precautions to avoid infection, such
as sanitizing utensils and surfaces that were in contact
with raw meat. The article also suggests that high-risk
people avoid certain foods, including non-dried deli meats.
Dried and salted deli meats such as salami generally do not
support growth of listeria, the article notes.
Asked on Thursday if Health Canada would tell long-term care
facilities to stop serving deli meats, Dr. Jeff Farber of
Health Canada said only that the educational material the
department has available now is effective, and will be
improved in future (how does he know it is effective? ñ dp)
Dr. Andrew Potter, an infectious disease expert at the
University of Saskatchewan, argued against banning
individual items, noting that almost any food can be a
source of some harmful microbe. Past listeria outbreaks have
stemmed from milk and cabbage, spinach sometimes carries E.
coli and unpasteurized apple cider harbours salmonella. It
is better to prevent contamination at the source, with safer
meat processing or by developing vaccines for animals, he
said.
Dr. Jill Hobbs, another University of Saskatchewan professor
who specializes in the economics of food safety, also
dismissed the idea of keeping certain foods from the
elderly. She advocates better tracing of food so recalls can
be more effective.
"We risk implying that all deli meats are dangerous," she
said. "It's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater."
BLOG:
Listeria scare overwhelms laboratories in Canada
29.aug.08
Medindia Health News
http://blogs.medindia.net/general-news/listeriosis-scare-overwhelms-laboratories-in-canada/
The listeriosis scare is overwhelming the blood testing
laboratories in Ontario, Canada. The labs are being advised
to refuse tests for those who have no symptoms.
It is in such a backdrop there seems a major rush for blood
tests. Authorities say that it is normal for people who've
eaten recalled meat to wonder if they'll get sick with
listeriosis - the bacteria has an incubation period of 11 to
70 days. But in Ontario, so many people are seeking blood
tests that the labs are unable to cope with the demand on
them.
Healthy people who have eaten recalled products will likely
be fine and need not seek medical attention. If you have
eaten the products and develop food poisoning or a fever,
those are reasons to go to a doctor, health officials said.
"The concern is, capacity will be completely overwhelmed and
we won't be able to deliver service to people who really
need to have blood cultures," said Dr. Frank Thompson,
medical director of Lifelabs in Toronto, which analyzes
blood samples sent by doctors from across Ontario.
Thompson's lab would normally run fewer than 10 blood
cultures for listeria a day. Since the beginning of the
week, the lab has been doing more than 150 a day.
There is no benefit in testing healthy people, agreed Dr.
Vanessa Allen, a microbiologist at Ontario Public Health
Labs.
"There is no test for those who are asymptomatic because
it's not clear that would give us any information that would
be helpful, nor is there any therapy that would be offered,"
said Allen.
Family doctors in Ontario said they were told about the meat
recall, but they were given little other direction from
public health officials.
"That advisory as far as I can recall didn't mention what
should we be doing if a healthy person comes in and asks to
be tested," said Dr. Dara Maker, a family physician in
Toronto.
Thompson said he understands it is difficult for family
doctors to persuade people they don't need the test, but he
urged physicians to do so. Provincial health officials told
doctors to order tests only if patients are showing
symptoms, such as malaise, fever, diarrhea and cramps.
CALGARY:
Moral of the story
29.aug.08
Calgary Herald
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/letters/story.html?id=5ee7f572-fd74-469b-9c08-fe113ea2f2ab
Denise Volk, Calgary writes regarding, "Tragedy handled
compassionately," Editorial, Aug. 27 to say she was shocked
to read that Maple Leaf Foods' handling of the deadly
listeria outbreak should be a lesson in corporate
responsibility. Apologies and full-page ads do little to
comfort the families of the people who suffered and died
from this deadly outbreak. What about the pregnant women who
have become exposed? What comfort do they take if their
unborn baby dies or becomes very ill? Corporate
responsibility happens at the beginning of the process.
Why did Maple Leaf Foods have to hear about the deadly
outbreak being traced to their facility? Why did they
themselves not discover the problem? Do they not test their
products daily to ensure consumers are safe from food-borne
pathogens? Why do health inspectors have to do the company's
job of monitoring food safety? Let's see what Michael McCain
does from here. Do they shut down that plant permanently? We
have heard from many experts that listeria is very difficult
to eradicate. Does Maple Leaf take an unprecedented step in
trying to compensate victims' families without having the
families being forced to engage in expensive class-action
lawsuits?
Let this be a lesson to other food processing facilities.
Take the steps up front to prevent illness from killing your
customers. Spend the money upfront to hire onsite health
inspectors who monitor food safety daily. I am sure McCain
would agree that this is true corporate responsibility.
OPINION:
Don't fret, we eat listeria 'all the time'
29.aug.08
Ottawa Citizen
Kelly Egan
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/city/story.html?id=26a3e26d-3408-4bba-b7ea-0a208571cd7d
I've been making school lunches for seven years now. It is a
wonder -- lost on listeria -- I haven't killed the poor lad.
Thousands of parents, no doubt, are wondering what to put in
that lunch box next week. Would you buy a bunch of cold cuts
right now and, without hesitation, feed them to your child?
It's probably safe. This is how much the world has changed
in two weeks.
The more you read about listeria, the more you realize how
blind we've been to the safety of our food-supply chain.
The advice from the experts can be read in two ways: a)
panic or b) don't panic. Sorry, forgot to mention the third
option: c) everyone back to sleep.
Rick Holley is a professor of microbiology at the University
of Manitoba. He has worked in government and in private
industry, looking at ways that pathogens get into the food
supply.
I asked him whether, in this climate, he would send his
children or grandchildren to school with a cold-cut
sandwich.
"Sure I would. I've told my kids not to be overly concerned
about this. We're eating listeria all the time."
It would be easy to conclude that listeria is an exotic
visitor to one Toronto meat plant and, after a sound
scrubbing down, it's back to normal, ham-and-cheese forever.
If only it were so.
Listeria, for one thing, has several different species and
sub-strains, some more harmful to humans.
"There is significant risk," Mr. Holley says, "every time
you pick up lettuce or a carrot or tomato that listeria is
going to be there, too."
No doubt consumers are strategizing about how to buy meat
safely. I have heard much talk about avoiding products from
large commercial outfits, in favour of local delis or
ma-and-pa shops.
Intuitively, it makes sense -- fewer steps in the chain,
more careful handling, trust in the butcher, no mass
production, etc. ...
Draw no comfort, Mr. Holley says. The sense of security will
be false. "No. They can have listeria, too."
While the volume of product is much smaller, so is the level
of inspection, he pointed out.
A large producer will have more frequent inspections, but,
even on this point, Mr. Holley says, do not view inspection
as a guarantee.
"You can't inspect safety into food."
The inspector cannot visually check for listeria, he said,
nor can he perform an instant test. By the time the bacteria
is detected in a sample, the product is probably out in the
marketplace.
If we tested 100 locations that cut and serve meat, I asked,
how many would turn up positive for some strain of listeria?
"It's a hard question to answer," Mr. Holley said.
"Periodically, you might find it in all of them. But not
consistently in all of them. It comes in the plants all the
time, but it gets flushed out."
ONTARIO: Meat
of the matter
29.aug.08
Globe and Mail
Pat Steenberg
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080829.COLETTS29-1/TPStory/Comment
Ottawa -- What is so surprising about the listeria outbreak
is that it is so "surprising." The food industry's
increasingly centralized structure makes it nearly certain a
pathogen entering the food supply will be widely
distributed.
In the U.S., four companies slaughter 80 per cent of the
beef. Hamburger is made in huge batches using meat trimmings
from multiple carcasses from multiple suppliers. A research
project at Colorado State University found, based on DNA,
that the average four-ounce patty contains tissue from 55
cattle; some had tissue from 1,000 cattle.
Moreover, most livestock now spend half their life in animal
feeding operations or feed lots, where they continually walk
in and on manure. One in two feedlot cattle harbour the
O157:H7 strain of E. coli, as many as four in five in the
summer
OKLAHOMA: E.
coli count keeps rising near Locust Grove
29.aug.08
NewsOK.com
John David Sutter
http://newsok.com/e.-coli-count-keeps-rising/article/3290119/?tm=1219986389
A state investigation into an E. coli bacteria outbreak in
northeast Oklahoma is now focused exclusively on the Country
Cottage restaurant in Locust Grove, the state Health
Department confirmed Thursday.
The department says an unusual strain of E. coli is to blame
for at least 73 illnesses, 50 hospitalizations and one
death. That toll has risen each day since the outbreak
became public Monday.
Victims have become sick with severe stomach cramps and
bloody diarrhea. At least 12 of the victims are children,
according to St. Francis Hospital in Tulsa, and several are
undergoing dialysis.
The bacteria found in connection with the outbreak are part
of a group of toxin-producing E. coli that is highly
contagious. As few as 10 bacteria can make a person sick,
state epidemiologist Kristy Bradley said. People should wash
their hands before preparing food and after using the rest
room to avoid contamination. If you come down with severe
diarrhea, medical officials recommend you seek immediate
medical help.
A spokeswoman for the restaurant said Wednesday it is
unclear when the restaurant will open again. Two restaurant
employees are among the ill, Bradley said, adding that they
could have become sick from the restaurant's food, or may
have caused the contamination.
The state also sent stool samples to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention in Atlanta for further analysis. The
state could not determine the exact type of E. coli present.
UK: 15 struck
down as E coli hits village's water supply
29.aug.08
The Daily Record
Lachlan Mackinnon
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/news-feed/2008/08/29/15-villagers-hit-by-e-coli-86908-20715544/
Fifteen villagers have been struck down by an E coli
outbreak, it emerged yesterday.
Health chiefs revealed that seven people were confirmed as
having the O157 strain of the bug. A further eight were
showing symptoms.
An outbreak of the same strain in 1996 resulted in the
deaths of 21 elderly people in Lanarkshire.
All those affected in the latest incident, including a
number of kids, shared a private water supply to eight homes
in Auchinclech, near Westhill, Aberdeenshire.
NHS Grampian said two adults were treated in hospital and
discharged. The rest were treated by their GPs.
A spokesman added: "None of those affected are giving cause
for concern.
"We have contacted all the householders affected. They have
been advised to boil their water before drinking or using it
to prepare food.
"Aberdeenshire Council have provided advice on measures to
protect the water quality in the longer term.
"This outbreak highlights the risks associated with private
water supplies. They are liable to bacteriological
contamination, causing infections."
US: Concerns
remain as salmonella outbreak comes to an end
29.aug.08
Los Angeles Times
Tiffany Hsu
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-salmonella29-2008aug29,0,6754844.story
Four months after an outbreak of salmonella hospitalized
hundreds, forced groceries to toss out tomatoes and peppers
by the thousands, infuriated fruit and vegetable growers and
puzzled consumers, health authorities said Thursday that the
epidemic was about over.
Officials said the number of cases from the nation's largest
epidemic of food-borne illness had slid to non-outbreak
levels in early August and there had been no clusters of
victims since early July.
The produce industry and its customers felt a prolonged --
and often crippling -- burden lift.
"Unquestionably, we're relieved," said Tom Nassif, chief
executive of the Irvine-based Western Growers Assn., whose
members cultivate about half of the nation's produce. "But
we don't want this thing swept under the rug. We still have
a lot of people out there hurting."
The industry response is estimated to have cost between $130
million and $250 million, and workers who lost jobs and
growers who planted a smaller crop this year will continue
to feel the aftershocks.
Several produce executives accused the Food and Drug
Administration of running a lengthy, uncertain investigation
that shifted suspicion from tomatoes to jalapeno and serrano
peppers, shattering consumer confidence.
Infections were first reported in mid-April, leading the FDA
to issue a warning against certain tomatoes in early June.
By the time the advisory was lifted in mid-July, many
retailers had removed all tomatoes from shelves.
Weeks later, the FDA fingered Mexican jalapeno peppers after
contaminated samples were found in a victim's home and a
Texas distribution center. Soon after, the agency said it
discovered salmonella in a serrano pepper and irrigation
water on a Mexican farm. Mexican officials said tests by
their investigators cleared the farm as the source.
American produce executives griped that at the beginning of
the investigation health officials zeroed in too quickly on
domestic tomatoes and refused to consider other possible
sources. The FDA also shunned offers by produce producers to
supply information that could have helped narrow the
trace-back, they said.
A bill introduced in July by Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-Fla.) asks
the Department of Agriculture to compensate tomato growers
and packers nationwide for $100 million in losses relating
to the outbreak.
"Everybody agrees that this went on way too long and was
unfocused, and that the public's health was not served,"
said Lisa Lochridge, a spokeswoman for the Florida Fruit &
Vegetable Assn.
Still, in a conference call with reporters Thursday, federal
health officials suggested that there would be no tidy
finale to the outbreak drama.
Some facts were straightforward: The outbreak sickened 1,442
people and caused at least 286 hospitalizations and possibly
two deaths.
But even though investigators found no tomatoes that tested
positive for salmonella, Robert Tauxe of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention said tomatoes might still
have been a carrier at the start of the outbreak.
Officials also said they could not be sure they had the
final or only origin of the outbreak.
And although the FDA on Thursday lifted the warning for
consumers to avoid fresh peppers from Mexico, officials said
they could not exclude the possibility that the bacteria
could have an encore in the U.S.
"None of us can give a cast-iron guarantee that Salmonella
Saintpaul won't reemerge," said David Acheson, the FDA's
food safety chief.
Industry executives and health officials said they were
trying to look ahead and use this outbreak to anticipate or
prevent the next.
Acheson said government and industry should improve
technology to better detect pathogens and promote electronic
product tracking. An estimated 30 to 40 pieces of
legislation have been introduced, industry executives said,
dealing with issues including food safety programs,
traceability and research funding.
"We're all trying to take something positive from a
situation that had nothing good and improve things moving
forward," Lochridge said.
BLOG: Quebec
champions raw milk cheese
28.aug.08
Canadian Living
The Foodie-file
http://canadianliving.com/blogs/foodie/2008/08/28/quebec-champions-raw-milk-cheese/
In North America, raw milk has been villainized as disease
carrying poisonous bile that must be banned for the good of
public safety. The rest of the world has been consuming raw
milk with little ill effect since the first person ever took
a stool and a pail to a lactating mammal. For years, raw
milk lobbyists have touted the benefits of drinking milk in
itís natural state. It is the irony of the food industry
that we are adding microbes back into dairy products, like
pre and probiotics, after we have obliterated these very
things that occur naturally in the name of public safety. In
the manner of sage bureaucratic wisdom and more likely for
the efficiency of industrialized food production,
governments have thrown out the baby with the bathwater when
it comes to raw milk consumption.
Currently in Canada, raw milk cannot be sold for consumption
and raw milk cheese must be aged for a minimum of 60 days, a
death knell for soft ripened cheese like Camembert and Brie.
If you have ever been to France and tasted Camembert and
thought, why does it taste so good here? - this is one of
the reasons why. The 60 day limit is a superfluous number
arrived at by compromise rather than science, the idea is
that the aging kills the pathogens in the milk but itís in
no way conclusive that the pathogens are dead at that point.
The pathogens are also the very thing that is desired by
cheese makers to achieve a complex flavour and texture to
cheese.
Quebec has been on the forefront of the crusade for
flavourful cheese. They led the outcry when in 1996 Ottawa
attempted an all out ban on raw milk cheese and Quebec
cheese makers have been lobbying the province for years to
change the regulations. Last month they won a battle for
flavourful food; the government has modified regulations to
allow the production and sale of raw-milk cheeses aged less
than 60 days.
A battle won but a war still to fight, will the rest of
Canada ever be allowed to include a runny Camembert on their
cheese board?
TEXAS:
Restaurant reports
29.aug.08
Lubbock Avalanche-Journal
http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/082908/hea_324541360.shtml
Restaurant reports for the week ending Aug. 24:
NO CRITICAL VIOLATIONS
ï Buckhorn Saloon (Bar), 5001 Ave. Q South Dr.
ï Cinemark Moves 16, 5721 58th St.
ï Lubbock Meals on Wheels, 2304 34th St.
ï Manna Bread and Wine (Bar), 2610 Salem Ave.
ï Rich-Mar Concessions, 3511 84th St.
ï VTS, 1802 E. 50th St.
ONE CRITICAL VIOLATION
ï Aramark Healthcare Support Service/UMC, 602 Indiana Ave. -
food contact surfaces found soiled. Corrected on site.
ï Southern Specialty, 4320 19th St. - inadequate dish
sanitation. Corrected by 8/21.
ï Cast Iron Grill Catering, 7407 83rd St. - good hygienic
practices not followed. Corrected on site.
ï El Tropico, 114 University Ave. - improper handling of
ready-to-eat foods. Corrected on site.
ï Pizza Hut, 4401 82nd St. - cold hold food hold at improper
temperature. Corrected on site.
TWO OR MORE CRITICAL VIOLATIONS
ï August Foods, 4820 Ave. Q - good hygienic practices not
followed. Inaccessible handwash facilities. Corrected on
site.
ï El Chico, 4301 Marsh Sharp Freeway - good hygienic
practices not followed. Food contact surfaces found soiled.
Corrected on site.
ï Sonic, 1609 MLK Blvd. - observed possible
cross-contamination. Corrected on site. Food contact
surfaces found soiled. Corrected by 8/21.
ï Buns over Texas, 3402 73rd St. - cold hold food hold at
improper temperature. Food contact surfaces found soiled.
Corrected on site.
ï Lolly's Bar, 6624 I-27 - cold hold food hold at improper
temperature. Corrected on site. No thermometer in cooling
unit. Corrected by 8/19.
ï Manna Bread and Wine (Food Service), 2610 Salem Ave. -
cold hold food hold at improper temperature. Food contact
surfaces found soiled. Corrected on site.
ï Burger King, 2405 19th St. - good hygienic practices not
followed. Corrected on site. No thermometer in cooling unit.
Observed no posting of consumer Heimlich advisories.
Corrected by 8/22.
ï Jake's (Front Bar), 5025 50th St. Suite A - observed
possible cross-contamination. Inadequate handwash
facilities. Toxic items stored improperly. Corrected on
site.
ï Kids Are Cool, 7112 82nd St. - observed dented cans. Toxic
items stored improperly. Observed no posting of consumer
Heimlich advisories. Corrected on site.
ï Wee Care Fun Center, 2325 N. University Ave. - inadequate
employee handwashing. Toxic items stored improperly.
Corrected on site. Observed no tip sensitive thermometers
for thin-massed foods. Corrected by 8/21.
ï Pizza Hut, 5718 4th St. - good hygienic practices not
followed. Observed dented cans. Corrected on site. Food
contact surfaces found soiled. Corrected by next routine
inspection.
ï Fast Eddie's (Bar), 7301 University Ave. Suite 400 - good
hygienic practices not followed. Food contact surfaces found
soiled. Corrected on site.
ï A New World Daycare No. 2, 2601 Slide Rd. - good hygienic
practices not followed. Inadequate date-marking system.
Observed no tip sensitive thermometers for thin-massed
foods. Food contact surfaces found soiled. Corrected on
site.
ï Jake's (Food Service), 5025 50th St. Suite A - cold hold
food hold at improper temperature. Good hygienic practices
not followed. Toxic items stored improperly. Corrected on
site. Food contact surfaces found soiled. Corrected by 8/20.
ï Jessie's No. 2, 6606 W. 19th St. - cold hold food hold at
improper temperature. Inadequate employee handwashing. Good
hygienic practices not followed. Toxic items stored
improperly. Corrected on site. Observed insect contamination
(severe fly problem). Food contact surfaces found soiled.
Corrected by 8/25.
ï A and W/Long John Silver's, 5402 4th St. - cold hold food
hold at improper temperature. Good hygienic practices not
followed. Inadequate date-marking system. Inadequate
handwash facilities. Food contact surfaces found soiled.
Corrected on site. Observed no tip sensitive thermometers
for thin-massed foods. Corrected by 8/21.
IRELAND: An
international meeting on Cronobacter
29.aug.08
UCD Centre for Food Safety
http://www.ucd.ie/crono09/
Welcome
Dear Colleagues
We are pleased to invite you to an International Conference
on Cronobacter (Enterobacter sakazakii). This conference
will be held at University College Dublin, Ireland over two
days from Thursday January 22nd to Friday January 23rd in
2009.
The conference is intended as a forum to disseminate
information between industry, clinicians, government bodies
and academic research. This will be the first conference of
its kind where representatives from all these disciplines
with an interest in this area are gathered together to
exchange ideas.
The conference will include sessions on taxonomy,
identification, surveillance, occurrence, public health and
risk assessment. Workshops will be held after each series of
talks to provide an opportunity for questions and open
discussion.
The conference will include poster as well as oral
presentations and abstracts are invited.
We look forward to seeing you in Dublin!
Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: The Lactobacillus genus
01.sep.08
International Journal of Food Microbiology Vol. 126, Issue 3
Marion Bernardeaua, b, Jean Paul Vernouxa, SÈgolËne
Henri-Dubernetc and Micheline GuÈguena
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235061%232008%23998739996%23696746%23FLA%23&_cdi=5061&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=11c2a343c71d4030f6030cc4bceaf902
Abstract
Lactobacilli are Gram positive rods belonging to the Lactic
Acid Bacteria (LAB) group. Their phenotypic traits, such as
each species' obligate/facultative, homo/heterofermentation
abilities play a crucial role in souring raw milk and in the
production of fermented dairy products such as cheese,
yoghurt and fermented milk (including probiotics). An up to
date safety analysis of these lactobacilli is needed to
ensure consumer safety. Lactobacillus genus is a
heterogeneous microbial group containing some 135 species
and 27 subspecies, whose classification is constantly being
reshuffled. With the recent use of advanced molecular
methods it has been suggested that the extreme diversity of
the Lactobacillus genomes would justify recognition of new
subgeneric divisions. A combination of genotypic and
phenotypic tests, for example DNA-based techniques and
conventional carbohydrate tests, is required to determine
species. Pulsed-Field gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) has been
successfully applied to strains of dairy origin and is the
most discriminatory and reproducible method for
differentiating Lactobacillus strains. The bibliographical
data support the hypothesis that the ingestion of
Lactobacillus is not at all hazardous since lactobacillemia
induced by food, particularly fermented dairy products, is
extremely rare and only occurs in predisposed patients. Some
metabolic features such as the possible production of
biogenic amines in fermented products could generate
undesirable adverse effects. A minority of starter and
adjunct cultures and probiotic Lactobacillus strains may
exceptionally show transferable antibiotic resistance.
However, this may be underestimated as transferability
studies are not systematic. We consider that transferable
antibiotic resistance is the only relevant cause for caution
and justifies performing antibiotic-susceptibility assays as
these strains have the potential to serve as hosts of
antibiotic-resistance genes, with the risk of transferring
these genes to other bacteria. However, as a general rule,
lactobacilli have a high natural resistance to many
antibiotics, especially vancomycin, that is not
transferable. Safety assessment requirements for
Lactobacillus strains of technological interest should be
limited to an antibiotic profile and a study to determine
whether any antibiotic resistance(s) of medical interest
detected is (or are) transferable. This agrees with the
recent EFSA proposal suggesting attribution of a QPS status
for 32 selected species of lactobacilli.
Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: Streptococcus
thermophilus
01.sep.08
International Journal of Food Microbiology Vol 126, Issue 3
Christine Delorme, a
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235061%232008%23998739996%23696746%23FLA%23&_cdi=5061&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=11c2a343c71d4030f6030cc4bceaf902
Abstract
Streptococcus thermophilus is a major dairy starter used in
yogurt and cheese production. In Streptococcus genus, S.
thermophilus is the only one food species among commensal
and opportunistic pathogen species. Comparative genomics
suggest that this species recently emerged and evolved by
combination of loss-of-function and horizontal gene transfer
events. These gene transfer events detected in S.
thermophilus have originated from other dairy species and
might contribute to its adaptation to the milk environment.
aLaboratoire de GÈnÈtique Microbienne, INRA de
Jouy-en-Josas, France
Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: The Lactococcus genus
01.sep.08
International Journal of Food Microbiology Vol 126, Issue 3
Erick Casaltaa, and Marie-Christine Montelb
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235061%232008%23998739996%23696746%23FLA%23&_cdi=5061&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=11c2a343c71d4030f6030cc4bceaf902
Abstract
The Lactococcus genus includes 5 species. Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis is the most common in dairy product but L.
garviae has been also isolated. Their biotope is animal skin
and plants. Owing to its biochemical characteristics,
strains of L. lactis are widely used in dairy fermented
products processing. Cases of human infections due to
lactococci are very seldom reported even if Lactococcus
garviae can be involved in fish diseases. Then L. lactis can
be considered as safe and it is most commonly considered as
Generally Recognized as Safe.
aINRA, UR45 Recherches sur le DÈveloppement de l'Elevage,
Campus Grossetti, F-20250 CortÈ, France bINRA, UMT545
Recherches FromagËres, 36, rue de Salers, F-15000 Aurillac,
France
Safety
assessment of dairy microorganisms: Bacterial taxonomy
01.sep.08
International Journal of Food Microbiology Vol 126, Issue 3
DaniËle Sohiera, FranÁoise Berthierb, and JoÎlle Reitzc, 1
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=PublicationURL&_tockey=%23TOC%235061%232008%23998739996%23696746%23FLA%23&_cdi=5061&_pubType=J&view=c&_auth=y&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=11c2a343c71d4030f6030cc4bceaf902
Abstract
Safety assessment requires uniform and reproducible
nomenclature schemes for all the micro-organisms
deliberately added in fermented food products. The QPS
approach described by EFSA is based on the identity of an
isolate at the highest taxonomic unit that is appropriate
for the purpose for which the evaluation is intended. This
depends upon the body of knowledge available for the
micro-organism to be assessed and upon the nature of the
micro-organism being assessed. Species identification is the
fundamental unit of biological classification and is
critical for describing, understanding and comparing
biological diversities at different levels among ecological
niches. Accurate taxonomic identification of a
micro-organism is essential for assessing safety assessment,
and this section describes current and advanced knowledge on
bacterial taxonomy.
aADRIA, Z.A. de CrÈac'h Gwen, 29196 Quimper cedex, France
bURTAL, B.P. 20089, 39801 Poligny cedex, France cSOREDAB,
Chemin de la Tremblaye, 78125 La BoissiËre Ecole, France
FSnet is produced by the
International Food Safety Network at Kansas State
University, and is supported at the Gold Fork level by:
Marler Clark.
FSnet is supported at the Sterling Fork level by: CropLife
Canada, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural
Affairs , New Zealand Food Safety Authority, Monsanto
Canada, and the Ontario Cattlemen's Association.
Fsnet is supported at the Silver-plate Fork level by: The
National Restaurant Association, Unilever, Sholl Group/Green
Giant Fresh, Feedlot Health Management Services, McDonald's,
and Syngenta Crop Protection Canada.
The Food Safety Network presents a unique opportunity to
bring together all those associated with agriculture and
food, to enhance the safety of the food supply. To provide
financial support to the Food Safety Network, please visit
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu/en/donations.php. For
information on collaboration or fee-for-service
opportunities, please contact Dr. Doug Powell:
dpowell@ksu.edu
To subscribe to the html version of FSnet, send mail to:
(subscription is free)
listserv@listserv.ksu.edu
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type:
subscribe fsnet-L firstname lastname
i.e. subscribe fsnet-L Doug Powell
(replace fsnet-L with fsnettext to subscribe to the text
version)
To unsubscribe to the html version of FSnet, send mail to:
listserv@listserv.ksu.edu
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type: signoff fsnet-L
(replace fsnet-L with fsnettext to unsubscribe from the text
version)
For more information about the FSnet research program,
please contact:
Dr. Douglas Powell
associate professor
dept. diagnostic medicine/pathobiology
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS
66506
cell: 785-317-0560
fax: 785-532-4039
dpowell@ksu.edu
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu
archived at
http://archives.foodsafety.ksu.edu/fsnet-archives.htm
|
|