FSnet Aug.
1/08 -- II
13 Scouts get E. coli while at VIRGINIA camp
CANADA: Quebec to allow raw-milk cheeses
CANADA: Contempt case for Ont. farmer who
provided raw milk demands trial: judge
WISCONSIN: Meatpacker Excel must pay Sizzler
$7.1 million for E. coli outbreak
US: An appetite for science: For Food Network
host Alton Brown, science plays more than a
cameo role
US: Not-so-live blogging House Food Safety
Hearing No. Two
Produce industry faults FDA response to
salmonella outbreak for losses
EDITORIAL: Food poisoning
UK: Fears over restaurant hygiene standards
CANADA links 12th case of mad cow to infected
feed
Effects of sanitation, freezing and frozen
storage on enteric viruses in berries and herbs
Risk profiles of pork and poultry meat and risk
ratings of various pathogen/product combinations
Food additive may inhibit C. perfringens in
poultry
Photoactivated chlorophyllin-based gelatin films
and coatings to prevent microbial contamination
of food products
how to subscribe
13 Scouts get E. coli while at VIRGINIA camp
01.aug.08
Washington Post
Jonathan Mummolo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/01/AR2008080102855.html
http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/2008/08/articles/e-coli/e-coli-at-camp-13-scouts-sickened/index.html
Health officials have confirmed that at least 13
boys, all but one from Northern Virginia,
contracted E. coli bacterial infections while
attending a popular Scout camp in Goshen, Va.,
last week, officials said yesterday.
The Virginia Department of Health began
receiving reports of sick children on Sunday,
when boys from about 70 troops returned home
after a week at the Goshen Scout Reservation
near Lexington, Va., about three hours from
Washington. Two of the boys were hospitalized,
officials said.
The source of the outbreak was still under
investigation, said Christopher Novak, a Health
Department medical epidemiologist who is looking
into the incident. Symptoms of the infection
include bloody diarrhea, fever, chills, nausea
and vomiting, Novak said.
"This one is challenging in that it has multiple
states involved, and the individuals there are
fairly dispersed," he said. "We are trying to .
. . as quickly as possible get a sense of how
widespread the outbreak may be, how many people
are ill."
Health officials in Maryland have confirmed one
of the 13 cases, said Karen Black, spokeswoman
for the state's Department of Health and Mental
Hygiene. A call to the District's Health
Department was not immediately returned.
Since the outbreak, Scout officials have taken
steps to reduce the risk of further
contamination by temporarily removing ground
beef -- a common source of E. coli -- from camp
menus; distributing hand sanitizers; and
encouraging hand-washing and proper hygiene,
Lambert said. There is also increased
supervision for children who prepare their own
food, to ensure proper cooking temperatures.
Novak said health officials are trying to
determine whether infected Scouts ate the same
tainted food or ingested contaminated fluid,
such as lake water while swimming.
CANADA: Quebec to allow raw-milk cheeses
31.jul.08
Globe and Mail
Ingrid Peritz
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080731.wcheese01/BNStory/National/home
National Post
Graeme Hamilton
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/posted/archive/2008/07/31/quebec-s-smelly-revolution-cheese-makers-free-to-use-raw-milk.aspx
Montreal -- Quebec will allow its cheese makers
to produce the kind of stinky, oozing,
unpasteurized bries and camemberts that are
illegal in the rest of North America.
The government has modified regulations to allow
the production and sale of raw-milk cheeses that
have been aged for less than 60 days.
Elsewhere, such young cheeses are verboten due
to health concerns. But producers in Quebec,
which leads the country in raw-milk cheese
consumption, have been lobbying the province for
years to change the rules.
They believe such raw-milk cheese is not only
healthy, but pasteurization destroys microbes
that give their product a deep, palette-pleasing
flavour.
"We are very pleased by what is being put on the
table. It will bring about a new wave of soft
cheeses and raise them to a completely new
gustatory level," said Nancy Portelance, who
represents 17 artisan cheese makers in the
province.
Cheese lovers maintain that certain soft cheeses
like camembert reach their peak ripening point
at 21 to 30 days. "At that point, the cheese is
creamy, a lot more flavourful and more complex
at the level of aroma," said Ian Picard, master
cheese ripener at La Fromagerie Hamel in
Montreal.
Cheese ripening has proven a sticky matter
between Quebec and the federal government, and
an Ottawa attempt in 1996 to ban the sale of
raw-milk cheese raised a political stink in the
province. Gastronomes pointed out that Europeans
have been consuming such products with no ill
effects. (there's lots of ill effects – dp)
Until now, regulations required cheese makers
using raw milk to ripen the product at least 60
days on evidence it eliminated harmful bacteria
in the milk.
Mansel Griffiths, a dairy microbiologist at the
University of Guelph, says the 60-day limit has
become arbitrary, since it is no longer a
guarantee of destroying pathogens. Still, he
believes raw-milk cheese continues to pose
health-safety issues over potential pathogens.
"This is a true revolution," Agriculture
Minister Laurent Lessard said in a statement.
"Our artisans will be in a position to put their
renowned savoir-faire to use to create a new
generation of raw-milk cheeses responding to
consumers tastes."
CANADA: Contempt case for Ont. farmer who
provided raw milk demands trial: judge
31.jul.08
MedBroadcast.com
Colin Perkel, The Canadian Press
http://www.medbroadcast.com/channel_health_news_details.asp?news_id=15884&rss=67&rid=999999&channel_id=1039&rot=3
National Post
Jenny Wagler
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/toronto/archive/2008/07/31/big-victory-for-raw-milk-activist-schmidt.aspx
Newmarket, Ontario -- A contempt of court case
against an Ontario farmer accused of selling raw
milk is too serious to deal with without a
trial, a judge ruled Thursday.
Instead, Superior Court Justice Michael Brown
rejected a request from the municipality of York
Region to find Michael Schmidt in contempt and
put the case over for a three-day trial in
September, when the court can hear from
witnesses.
"One of the sanctions you are seeking is that
this man be jailed," Brown told Dan Kuzmyk, the
lawyer for the municipality.
"I would be hard-pressed under these
circumstances to prevent him from calling
evidence."
The region maintains that Schmidt, of Durham,
Ont., is in contempt because he has refused to
obey a court order that he comply with a May
2007 directive from public health authorities to
refrain from selling unpasteurized milk.
Schmidt still faces a trial in January related
to an armed raid on his farm in November 2006
when health officials seized his milking
equipment.
With about 50 of his supporters in the courtroom
- many wearing "freedom of choice" buttons -
Schmidt, of Durham, Ont., told the judge he was
"appalled" the regional municipality was
pressing the contempt case now.
Kuzmyk attempted to persuade the judge to move
on the contempt matter, saying no trial was
needed.
"We have incontrovertible evidence," Kuzmyk
insisted. "We have photographs."
Brown refused to bite, saying Schmidt should
have the right to challenge the evidence at
trial.
Outside court, Kuzmyk said the farmer was
"thumbing his nose" at health-unit and court
orders - behaviour that constituted a threat to
the "very fabric" of a democratic society.
WISCONSIN: Meatpacker Excel must pay Sizzler
$7.1 million for E. coli outbreak
31.jul.08
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Marie Rohde
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=778277
A jury Wednesday found that meatpacker Excel
Corp. will have to pay Sizzler USA, a national
restaurant chain, more than $7.1 million for
lost revenue resulting from publicity
surrounding the outbreak of a food-borne illness
that killed a child and sickened scores of
others at restaurants here eight years ago.
The jury award brings the cost to Excel to $18.5
million plus lawyer fees.
Ron Pezze, a lawyer representing the local
restaurant franchise and its insurance company,
said the jury verdict also means that Excel will
have to reimburse 80% of the $3.5 million that
his clients paid to victims of the outbreak
years ago. The local franchise, E&B Management
of Waukesha, was seeking reimbursement for all
the money paid out, but the jury found the
franchise to be 20% responsible for the
outbreak.
Excel already had paid $8.5 million in June to
the family of the child who died, according to
lawyers involved in the case.
A spokesman for Excel, a subsidiary of food
giant Cargill Inc., said in a written statement
that the company was disappointed in the
decision and was considering its options.
US: An appetite for science: For Food Network
host Alton Brown, science plays more than a
cameo role
28.jul.08
Chemical and Engineering News: Science &
Technology Vol. 86, No. 30
Corrine A. Marasco
http://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/86/8630sci8.html
Alton Brown readily admits that he was an
undistinguished science student. "I took
physics, chemistry, and biology in college, and
they were all boring beyond words," he says.
"None of it mattered. None of it applied. It was
taught mostly by people who wanted to get tenure
and write grants. It was only when I decided
that the answer to most of my problems was
science that I became interested."
Irony: it's what's for dinner. His quest for
answers to kitchen-related questions led Brown
to create one of the best cooking with science
shows on television. "Good Eats" educates
viewers about the science of food and cooking
using historical references, pop culture,
costumes, and props. The science enhances the
step-by-step cooking tutorial, yet the
information is still highly relevant to the home
chef.
For example, episodes titled "Churn Baby Churn"
and "I Pie" explain, respectively, how sugar
crystallization affects the texture of ice cream
and what happens to a pie crust in the oven as
it bakes. These are the sort of processes that
chemists and materials scientists address
everyday. The show also features experts such as
Shirley O. Corriher, food scientist and author
of "CookWise: The Hows and Whys of Successful
Cooking" (William Morrow, 1997), and Deborah
Duchon, a nutritional anthropologist. In
addition, fictional experts make appearances,
such as "W," a kitchen equipment specialist
whose resemblance to James Bond's "Q" is no
coincidence.
If the components that comprise a "Good Eats"
episode are the spokes on a wheel, then Brown is
the creative hub. His presentation style, a
combination of Julia Child, British comedy
troupe Monty Python, and Mr. Wizard, has earned
him a dedicated following among viewers of all
ages, male and female.
Although he relies on analogies and metaphors to
explain concepts, he doesn't condescend to his
audience. His talent for invention assures
viewers that they don't need expensive
single-purpose appliances, which he calls
"uni-taskers." As demonstrated in the episode
"Good Milk Gone Bad," one doesn't need an
expensive yogurt maker if a couple of containers
and a heating pad are available at home. Yogurt
contains beneficial bacteria, such as
Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus
thermophilus, that love lactose, the sugar found
in milk. Adding a starter culture of plain,
store-bought yogurt to milk at 110 °F, Brown
shows that the bacteria will convert the lactose
into lactic acid. The heating pad helps to
maintain a steady temperature to allow the
bacteria to incubate. If the temperature of the
milk is too low, the bacteria won't grow to make
yogurt. If the temperature is too high, the
bacteria will die.
US: Not-so-live blogging House Food Safety
Hearing No. Two
31.jul.08
Washington Post
Annys Shin
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thecheckout/2008/07/notsolive_blogging_house_food.html?nav=rss_blog
Apologies for the delayed post. My air card died
just as the produce industry was piling on the
FDA and CDC.
If you want to listen along, you can go to the
House Energy and Commerce Committee Web site.
The theme of today's hearing is "Lessons
Learned" from the salmonella outbreak. So in
that vein, I thought I'd write up my top five
lessons learned.
1. Outbreaks don't respect state borders.
I wrote Wednesday about a Colorado woman, Cheryl
Grubbs, whose husband was an outbreak victim.
She had trouble getting the attention of her
local health officials partly because Colorado
hasn't had many cases, less than 20 so far.
However, Grubbs lives in the Four Corners area
where Utah, New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado
meet. The Arizona and New Mexico side of Four
Corners has been the "heartland" of the
outbreak, as CDC's Robert Tauxe put it. But with
the response she got, you would have thought she
lived in Hawaii.
Her attorney, Bill Marler, said her experience
is not uncommon:
"We have see the same thing in several
outbreaks. In the Dole spinach outbreak, we or
clients had to hire private labs to link two
deaths to the outbreak when local, state and
national health officials could not be
bothered.Whether it is a lack of funding or
sheer laziness, ignoring the public and the
publics' health puts all of us in danger. When,
not if, a bioterrorism event occurs, ill people
like the Grubbs will be our 'early warning
system' and we [darn] will better be paying
attention."
2. Everyone's state stinks except for yours and
mine.
The different capacity of states to detect and
investigate outbreaks came up frequently. But
lawmakers took pains not to slam specific
states, especially if they had a rep in the
room. The only person who strayed from this
unspoken etiquette was Dr. Michael Osterholm,
the former state epidemiologist for Minnesota
and widely recognized as one of the top disease
detectives in the country. He dinged Texas for
taking as long as 15 days to confirm a
salmonella case, DNA fingerprint it and send the
info to epidemiologists--a process that in
Minnesota takes three days.
3. Minnesota rocks.
Osterholm can get away with saying that because
he helped build the foodborne detection and
investigation system in Minnesota, which is
considered among the best there is. Minn's state
epidemiologist Kirk Smith is testifying right
now about how his state was able to identify a
distributor in Texas that supplied tainted
jalapenos eaten by a cluster of sick restaurant
patrons in the Twin Cities area in less than 10
days of confirming its first cases. That tip led
FDA to Texas and to the farm in Mexico where
they found the contaminated irrigation water.
4. It takes a village to find bacteria.
One thing that hasn't come out in the hearing is
how many people it takes to do these multi state
investigations. CDC was kind enough to let me
talk to two Epidemic Intelligence Officers (EIS)
involved in the salmonella probe. (EIS is sort
of like FBI agents for infectious disease. One
EIS officer named Julie was sent to North
Carolina where she spent about two weeks in a
county health department office with a stack of
questionnaires. She called something like 70
people who ate at a restaurant linked to the
outbreak. Another EIS officer named Ryan was
sent to rural Missouri where he spent about 10
days meeting face-to-face with locals who ate at
another restaurant linked to the outbreak.
Working along side them were state and local
health workers. Multiply this effort a dozen
times and you get some inkling of how sprawling
these investigations are.
5. Eliza Doolittle had it right.
Yesterday, I was surprised that industry,
lawmakers and even the most strident FDA critics
made a point of saying Dr. David Acheson, the
FDA's top food safety official, was not the
problem. Part of the reason is Acheson stays
cool under pressure. And it doesn't hurt to have
a pleasing Britishy accent. The Produce
Marketing Association deployed their own
BBC-inflected spokesman, Bryan Silverman. I
think British accents should be mandatory from
all committee witnesses.
Produce industry faults FDA response to
salmonella outbreak for losses
01.aug.08
McClatchy Newspapers, Star-Telegram
Michael Doyle
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu/admin/edit.php?table=newsstories
WASHINGTON -- Turf struggles, bad communication
and weak leadership undermined the federal
response to a recent salmonella outbreak that
cost the tomato industry a bundle, witnesses
told a House subcommittee Thursday.
Lawmakers joined farmers in a wholesale attack
on the Food and Drug Administration's
performance, potentially laying the political
foundation for a regulatory overhaul and
multimillion-dollar compensation package.
"We have been the primary injured party,"
Reginald Brown, the executive vice president of
the Florida Tomato Growers Exchange, told the
House panel. "And we look forward to Congress
addressing that in the future."
Farmers say that the FDA and the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention erred in
indicating that the salmonella outbreak was
associated with tomatoes. State regulators
testified that the FDA shared information
reluctantly, while produce industry
representatives complained that no one seemed to
be in charge.
"We've noticed tensions [and] rivalries" among
federal food-safety agencies, United Fresh
Produce Association President Thomas E. Stenzel
told the House Energy and Commerce Committee's
oversight and investigations panel.
Federal food-safety officials still won't
exonerate tomatoes, although they say that fresh
tomatoes currently on the market are safe. FDA
Assistant Commissioner David Acheson stressed
Thursday that the initial reported illnesses
were "statistically linked to consumption of raw
tomatoes," although no tainted tomatoes were
found.
EDITORIAL: Food poisoning
31.jul.08
Beaver County Times & Allegheny Times
http://www.timesonline.com/articles/2008/07/31/opinion/editorials/doc48909f0df1940634732179.txt
We need only one word to demonstrate how
appalling it is that lobbyists were able to
derail federal regulations designed to create a
quick tracking system for food-borne illness in
the United States: Chi-Chi's.
Anyone living through the 2003 hepatitis A
epidemic in Beaver County knows how imported
green onions served at a Chi-Chi's restaurant
wrought havoc and tragedy. The toll: 660
sickened, five dead and numerous people
hospitalized by the ravaging virus.
Yet the White House in 2004 and 2005 killed
regulations that would have permitted the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration a quicker and
easier method of tracking down sources of such
outbreaks.
The Associated Press reported this week that
lobbyists were behind the travesty.
The report outlined how the food industry
pressured the Bush administration to limit
paperwork that companies have to maintain in
order for federal health inspectors to trace
tainted produce.
It also quashed a plan requiring the food
industry to maintain an electronic tracking
system that would have allowed investigators to
quickly trace an outbreak's source.
The Associated Press found that business groups
met at least 10 times with administration
officials between 2004 and 2005 while the FDA
regulations were being debated.
Food industry marketing groups spent more than
$4 million on lobbying during those years.
Their argument: The regulations were too costly,
too burdensome and so unnecessary.
UK: Fears over restaurant hygiene standards
31.jul.08
Norwich Evening News 24
Dan Grimmer
http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/news/story.aspx?brand=ENOnline&category=
News&tBrand=ENOnline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED31%20Jul%202008%2011%3A51%3A53%3A397
Hygiene standards in restaurants and food
outlets around Norwich could suffer if
Government plans are introduced which would
force the city council to scrap its pioneering
five-star food safety scheme.
At the moment, places which serve food in the
city are rated according to five categories, and
council officers believe Norwich City Council's
pioneering system helps keeps standards high.
But proposals made by the Food Standards Agency
under a national scheme would see Norwich's
five-star system, which has been introduced by
more than 150 local authorities, come to an
abrupt end.
Food safety officers at City Hall fear proposals
to introduce a national standard, which could
see a simple pass or fail scheme or grades from
zero to three stars, would mean restaurateurs
would not have the same motivation to constantly
strive for better standards.
Jaan Stanton, Norwich City Council's food safety
team leader, said: "There are two proposals
being put forward - one is a pass or fail system
which we are opposed to and a zero to three-star
scheme which we do not think is as good as our
five-star system.
"It is a great honour that we have been visited
by the Food Standards Agency to be part of the
consultation and I hope we have shown how the
five-star system is working.
"We know the five-star scheme works and has
brought benefits. The proposed three-star system
is quite broad and means we cannot reward
relatively minor improvements by giving an extra
star and taking it away if it slips a little. We
prefer our system because it means the
proprietors keep standards high."
As part of the consultation over the proposed
changes, Dame Deirdre Hutton, chair of the Food
Standards Agency yesterday visited Norwich City
Council to learn more about its five-star food
safety scheme.
She spent the day with the council's food safety
officers, chief executive Laura McGillivray and
leader Steve Morphew, who showed Dame Deirdre
how effective their scheme has been at improving
food safety.
Restaurateurs talked to Dame Deirdre about how
much they value having their efforts to improve
food safety recognised by the council.
The five-star food safety award was introduced
by Norwich City Council in spring 2005 as a way
of improving food safety in the city by making
restaurant inspection reports available to the
public.
The restaurants are given certificates with the
star rating, which can be displayed, and the
ratings and full inspection reports are posted
on the Norwich City Council website.
Steve Morphew, Norwich City Council leader,
said: "Norwich City Council is at the forefront
of promoting food safety standards. We welcomed
Dame Deirdre's visit and saw it as an
opportunity to showcase the scores on doors five
star scheme which as an organisation we are
extremely proud of."
The visit by Dame Deirdre also coincided with
the re-vamp of the council's Safer Food Award
webpage making it even easier for the public to
access food safety information about where they
eat in Norwich.
The current reports can be visited at
www.norwich.gov.uk/intranet_docs/A-Z/Environmental%20Health/2005/Food_Awards/Safer_Food_Master_List.pdf
CANADA links 12th case of mad cow to infected
feed
31.jul.08
Reuters
http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCAN3147939620080731
Ottawa -- An official probe into Canada's 12th
case of mad cow disease since 2003 said on
Thursday that infected feed was most likely to
blame -- the same reason given in many previous
cases.
The animal, a six-year-old dairy cow from
Alberta, was identified in February 2008. Since
then an additional case of bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE) has been discovered in
Canada.
"It is reasonable to presume that this animal
was exposed to feed containing a low level of
infectivity during its first year of life," the
Canadian Food Inspection Agency said in a
statement.
Effects of sanitation, freezing and frozen
storage on enteric viruses in berries and herbs
31.jul.08
International Journal of Food Microbiolgy
(Volume 126, Issues 1-2, Pages 1-262)
S. Butota, T. Putallaza and G. Sánchez
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T7K-4SFXK30-2&_user=10&_coverDate=08%2F15%2F2008&_rdoc=5&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235061%232008%23998739998%23695025%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5061&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct
Norovirus (NV) and hepatitis A virus (HAV) are
foodborne enteric viruses associated with
outbreaks of disease following consumption of
fresh or frozen produce. Model experiments were
performed to determine the effectiveness of
certain commercial processes for the removal of
enteric viruses that might be present in berries
and herbs. The survival and persistence of HAV,
NV, rotavirus (RV) and feline calicivirus (FCV),
a surrogate for NV, in frozen produce over time
were determined. Survival and inactivation of
HAV, RV and FCV were assessed by viral culture
and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR
(RT-PCR), whereas NV persistence was determined
by quantitative RT-PCR only. Freezing did not
significantly reduce the viability of any of the
viruses except the infectivity of FCV in
strawberries. Frozen storage for 3 months had
limited effects on HAV and RV survival in all
tested food products, whereas in frozen
raspberries and strawberries FCV infectivity
showed the highest decay rate due to acid pH. To
simulate postharvesting conditions, fresh
berries and herbs were rinsed with tap, warm or
chlorinated water or with a chlorine dioxide
(ClO2) solution. Available chlorine at a
concentration of 200 ppm and ClO2 at 10 ppm
reduced measurable enteric viruses in raspberry
and parsley samples by less than 2 log10 units.
Risk profiles of pork and poultry meat and risk
ratings of various pathogen/product combinations
15.aug.08
International Journal of Food Microbiolgy
(Volume 126, Issues 1-2, Pages 1-262)
M. Mataragasa, P.N. Skandamisa and E.H. Drosinos
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T7K-4SJP77R-2&_user=10&_coverDate=08%2F15%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235061%232008%23998739998%23695025%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5061&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_ct
Risk profiles of pork and poultry meat were
carried out using an Excel-based software
program, Risk Ranger. It is a semi-quantitative
risk estimator answering various questions
relating to the probability of exposure to a
hazard, susceptibility of the population of
interest, severity of the illness caused by the
hazard if present and probability of food
containing an infectious dose. Therefore,
qualitative and quantitative inputs were used to
estimate and rank the risk of various
hazards/food combinations. Risk scores provided
by the tool were characterized as low, medium
and high. Also, health risk was estimated
separately, where needed, for low and high risk
populations. Low risk scores were obtained for
Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes and
enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) for
low risk population. High risk scores were
obtained for hepatitis E virus (HEV) in raw pork
products (both low and high risk populations).
Moderate risk scores for Salmonella spp. and L.
monocytogenes in processed pork or poultry-meat
products (ready-to-eat or to be reheated) and
partially cooked pork products were also
obtained (low risk population). Scores for
Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens
and Bacillus cereus and various product types
were mostly in the "medium" risk category,
except for S. aureus/ready-to-eat pork products
able to support growth of the organism, which
fell into the high risk category. Campylobacter
spp. gave moderate risk scores with one
exception (raw poultry products), whereas Y.
enterocolitica showed combinations of low risk
and few of medium risk. High risk
pathogen/product combinations identified were:
1) temperature abused, ready-to-eat pork and/or
poultry-meat products with extended shelf life
and cross-contaminated by L. monocytogenes (high
risk population), EHEC (high risk population) or
S. aureus (all population), 2) partially cooked
or processed intended to be reheated pork
products cross-contaminated by L. monocytogenes,
served undercooked and receiving improper
cooling or reheating (high risk population), and
3) all people consuming undercooked meals
cross-contaminated with Campylobacter spp. (e.g.
from raw poultry and raw poultry-meat products)
and HEV (e.g. from raw pork and raw pork-meat
products). Salmonellae gave high risk scores in
all food categories (except preserved meat
products) for high risk population. Preserved
meats (mainly pork) such as dry fermented
sausages gave low risk scores. Only Salmonella
spp., L. monocytogenes and E. coli EHEC gave
moderate risk ratings in case of ingredients
likely to be contaminated at an early stage of
processing (e.g. animal at slaughter) and
inadequate fermentation process. These results
may constitute a source of information for
hazard assessment during application of a Food
Safety Management System.
Food additive may inhibit C. perfringens in
poultry
31.jul.08
Journal of Food Microbiology
http://www.worldpoultry.net/news/id2205-53709/food_additive_may_inhibit_c_perfringens_in_poultry.html
A new US study claims that inorganic
polyphosphates (polyP) can be effective as
antimicrobial agents against Clostridium
perfringens in meat and poultry products.
Inorganic polyphosphates are used as food
additives in the meat and poultry industry to
protect flavour, maintain "juiciness", and
inhibit rancidity and colour deterioration.
C. perfringens
C. perfringens are found in low numbers in many
foods, particularly in meat and poultry
products, but food poisoning linked to C.
perfringens is the 3rd most commonly reported
foodborne illness in the US. Unlike many other
types of bacteria that cause food borne disease,
C. perfringens are not completely destroyed by
ordinary cooking as it has been found to produce
heat-resistant spores.
Now, researchers from Oregon State University
claim a first-time a study has been done on the
antimicrobial properties of polyphosphates
against C. perfringens. They found a significant
reduction of survival in C. perfringens was
observed when meat samples contaminated with a
cocktail of the bacteria's spores were treated
with one per cent of the polyphosphate, sodium
tripolyphosphate (STPP).
As STPP increases water retention capacity in
meat products, the researchers used the polyP to
determine its antimicrobial effectiveness
against C. perfringens in meat. It was
discovered that sub-lethal concentrations of
polyP significantly inhibited sporulation of C.
perfringens by reducing heat-resistant cells.
While the spores were able to germinate in the
presence of 1% STPP, their outgrowth was
significantly inhibited.
"The inhibitory effect of polyP on C.
perfringens shown in this work constitutes a
major contribution that can help the development
of safer meat products," said the researchers.
Photoactivated chlorophyllin-based gelatin films
and coatings to prevent microbial contamination
of food products
15.aug.08
International Journal of Food Microbiolgy
(Volume 126, Issues 1-2, Pages 1-262)
G. López-Carballoa, P. Hernández-Muñoza, R.
Gavaraa and M.J. Ocio
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T7K-4SGKB8V-1&_user=10&_coverDate=08%2F15%2F2008&_rdoc=10&_fmt=high&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235061%232008%23998739998%23695025%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5061&_sort=d&_docanchor=&_c
The aim of this work was to develop
antimicrobial photosensitizer-containing edible
films and coatings based on gelatin as the
polymer matrix, incorporating sodium magnesium
chlorophyllin (E-140) and sodium copper
chlorophyllin (E-141). Chlorophyllins were
incorporated into the gelatin film-forming
solution and the inhibiting effect of the cast
films was tested against Staphylococcus aureus
and Listeria monocytogenes. The results
demonstrated that water soluble sodium magnesium
chlorophyllin and water soluble sodium copper
chlorophyllin reduced the growth of S. aureus
and L. monocytogenes by 5 log and 4 log
respectively.
Subsequently, the activity of self-standing
films and coatings containing E-140 was assessed
on cooked frankfurters inoculated with S. aureus
and L. monocytogenes. These tests showed that it
was possible to reduce microorganism growth in
cooked frankfurters inoculated with S. aureus
and L. monocytogenes by covering them with
sodium magnesium chlorophyllin-gelatin films and
coatings.
FSnet is produced by the International Food
Safety Network at Kansas State University, and
is supported at the Gold Fork level by: Marler
Clark.
FSnet is supported at the Sterling Fork level
by: CropLife Canada, Ontario Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs , New
Zealand Food Safety Authority, and the Ontario
Cattlemen's Association.
Fsnet is supported at the Silver-plate Fork
level by: The National Restaurant Association,
Unilever, Sholl Group/Green Giant Fresh, Feedlot
Health Management Services, McDonald's, and
Syngenta Crop Protection Canada.
The Food Safety Network presents a unique
opportunity to bring together all those
associated with agriculture and food, to enhance
the safety of the food supply. To provide
financial support to the Food Safety Network,
please visit
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu/en/donations.php.
For information on collaboration or
fee-for-service opportunities, please contact
Dr. Doug Powell: dpowell@ksu.edu
To subscribe to the html version of FSnet, send
mail to:
(subscription is free)
listserv@listserv.ksu.edu
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type:
subscribe fsnet-L firstname lastname
i.e. subscribe fsnet-L Doug Powell
(replace fsnet-L with fsnettext to subscribe to
the text version)
To unsubscribe to the html version of FSnet,
send mail to:
listserv@listserv.ksu.edu
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type: signoff fsnet-L
(replace fsnet-L with fsnettext to unsubscribe
from the text version)
For more information about the FSnet research
program, please contact:
Dr. Douglas Powell
associate professor
dept. diagnostic medicine/pathobiology
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS
66506
cell: 785-317-0560
fax: 785-532-4039
dpowell@ksu.edu
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu
archived at
http://archives.foodsafety.ksu.edu/fsnet-archives.htm
|
|