AnimalNet March 28/05 -- II

Skepticism over threat of avian flu; Most don't believe virus represents real danger: poll

Kansas State University to evaluate advanced ID's technology as a solution for livestock identification

Problems with ovulation hormones in cows

how to subscribe

Skepticism over threat of avian flu; Most don't believe virus represents real danger: poll
March 28, 2005
The Record (Kitchener, Cambridge and Waterloo)
A3
Source: Canadian Press
Most Canadians have, according responses gathered as part of Decima Research Inc.'s regular national omnibus public opinion poll and cited in this story, taken note of escalating warnings of the threat of a flu pandemic, but they don't feel the avian influenza virus ravaging parts of Southeast Asia represents a real danger to them.
The results were further cited as finding that 36 per cent of respondents feel authorities are exaggerating the level of the risk in order to encourage people to take precautions. And nearly 60 per cent of those polled say they either are not very worried or not at all concerned the avian flu could threaten their health or the health of their families.
The story notes that the polling was conducted from March 10 to 14. Findings are based on responses from 1,023 adult Canadians. The poll is considered accurate to within plus or minus 3.1 per cent, 95 times out of 100.



top

Kansas State University to evaluate advanced ID's technology as a solution for livestock identification
March 28, 2005
From a press release
CALGARY, ALBERTA - Advanced ID Corporation (OTCBB:AIDO), a complete solutions provider in the radio frequency identification (RFID) animal tracking and traceability market, provided its ultra high frequency (UHF) technology to Kansas State University's new Animal Identification Knowledge Laboratory for a formal evaluation and comparison to low frequency (LF) technology.
In response to the U.S. livestock industry's desire to implement a RFID-based identification and trace back system to eliminate the spread of disease, Kansas State University initiated a research program to assess RFID technology for livestock applications which it evaluates on an ongoing basis as new products are released.
Along with its ongoing evaluation of current LF technology, the Department of Animal Sciences and Industry has agreed to evaluate Advanced ID's UHF technology through its Animal Identification Knowledge Laboratory. The objective of its evaluation is to provide empirical data on the viability of UHF technology, provide a comparative study on the features and benefits of UHF and LF technology, and to educate industry users on theefficiency of RFID for livestock identification and traceability.
Barry Bennett, President and CEO of Advanced ID Corporation stated, "We are very pleased to have Dr. Dale Blasi and his colleagues, the leaders in animal RFID research among North American universities, provide an independent evaluation of our UHF technology for livestock identification. The real benefit of this evaluation will be to provide industry users with an accurate understanding of the features of UHF and LF technology."
Bennett further commented, "We continue to hear from current RFID users in the livestock industry from the United States, Canada, Australia and other countries that low frequency technology is not meeting their needs. Some users have commented that LF scanners are very large and bulky, not user friendly, unreliable in operating environments with machinery, and can only read one tag at a time. Others have said they feel LF technology is too limited in scope to make it a permanent option. Our UHF technology will allow users to implement a cost effective identification and trace back system, attain greater efficiency and automation within their own operations - as well as throughout the supply chain, and ensure reliable data for expedient trace back queries. With our experience selling LF products to the animal market since 1994, we believe UHF technology offers significantly greater benefits for livestock management."
In other developments, with the recent appointment of Thailand's new Minister of Agriculture, Advanced ID is expected to resume its negotiations to secure a contract for livestock identification and trace back of chickens, pigs and cattle. In Taiwan, the Company is presently modifying its RFID tags utilized for the identification and trace back of pigs due to some tags being damaged from biting. Once its RFID tags are able to withstand this biting pressure - expected in the weeks ahead, Advanced ID will continue its field trials.
In Advanced ID's January 4, 2005 press release, the Company announced it had received a $135,000 microchip order from the University of PEI and the Government of Newfoundland. It should be noted that a portion of this contract was received from the Government of Canada - Newfoundland and not from the Government of Newfoundland.
www.asi.ksu.edu.
www.advancedidcorp.com.



top

Problems with ovulation hormones in cows
March 28, 2005
PNAS Online Early Edition
Cows given hormones to trigger ovulation may have more problems
becoming pregnant and carrying the fetus to term than those that
ovulate naturally, researchers report. The findings have implications
for fertility treatments in humans. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), produced naturally in animals and humans, causes a surge of two hormones that stimulate ovulation. When GnRH is administered as part of assisted reproduction, however, the follicle on the ovary may be of varying sizes and physiological maturity. To understand how follicle size affects fertility, George Perry and colleagues examined 165 cows treated with hormones, including GnRH, and compared them with 179 cows allowed to ovulate spontaneously. The researchers found that if GnRH-treated cows ovulated when their follicles were smaller than normal, they had fewer pregnancies and more miscarriages late in pregnancy. Yet follicle size had no effect on fertility in untreated cows. The authors speculate that GnRH may start a hormonal surge before a follicle has matured.
"Relationship between follicle size at insemination
and pregnancy success" by George A. Perry, Michael F. Smith, Matthew
C. Lucy, Jonathan A. Green, Tina E. Parks, Michael D. MacNeil, Andrew
J. Roberts, and Thomas W. Geary
top



Animalnet is produced by the Food Safety Network at the University of Guelph, and is supported by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Health Canada, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, AGCare, the Agricultural Adaptation Council (CanAdapt Program), National Pork Board, ConAgra Foods, Inc., Dairy Farmers of Canada, Ontario Cattlemen's Association, Food Safety & Security at Kansas State University, Canadian Animal Health Institute, Pfizer Animal Health, National Food Processor's Association, National Turkey Federation, Feedlot Health Management Services, Tyson, Canadian Livestock Genetics Association, Canadian Pork Council, ATD Waste Systems, Inc., Global Public Affairs and Heifer International.The Food Safety Network's national toll-free line for obtaining food safety information: 1-866-50-FSNET (1-866-503-7638).

The Food Safety Network presents a unique opportunity to bring together all those associated with agriculture and food, to enhance the safety of the food supply. To provide financial support to the Food Safety Network, please visit http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu/donation.html. For information on collaboration or fee-for-service opportunities, please contact Dr. Doug Powell: dpowell@uoguelph.ca

To subscribe to the html version of AnimalNet, send mail to:
(subscription is free)
listserv@listserv.uoguelph.ca
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type:
subscribe animalnet-L firstname lastname
i.e. subscribe animalnet -L Doug Powell
(replace animalnet-L with annettext to subscribe to the text version)

To unsubscribe to AnimalNet, send mail to:
listserv@listserv.uoguelph.ca
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type:
signoff animalnet-L
(replace animalnet-L with annettext to unsubscribe to the text version)

For more information about the AnimalNet research program, please contact:
Dr. Douglas Powell
Associate Professor
dept. of plant agriculture
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ont.
N1G 2W1
tel: 519-824-4120 x54280
cell: 519-835-3015
fax: 519-763-8933
dpowell@uoguelph.ca
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu

The Food Safety Network's bilingual toll-free line for obtaining food safety
information: 1-866-50-FSNET (1-866-503-7638)


archived at: http://archives.foodsafety.ksu.edu/animalnet-archives.htm