Agnet Dec. 9/03

Impact of biotech crops questioned

GM trees trigger row at UN climate talks

Farmer leading fight against GM seed to speak in province

Apron Maxx RTA sets a new standard for pulse and bean seed treatments

Plant immune system's 'take two aspirin' gene, offers hope for disease control

EPA orders pest control company to stop selling illegal pesticide

how to subscribe

Impact of biotech crops questioned
December 9, 2003
The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon)
C4
Paul Hanley writes that unlike many environmentalists, he is not categorically opposed to genetically modified (GM) crops. Hanley says that genetic modification is just the latest tool in plant breeding, and arguably more precise than traditional methods. That said, every GM crop should be thoroughly screened to identify its environmental, health and economic impacts.
It is difficult, however, to achieve a reasonable degree of comfort about the impacts of GM crops when there is a potential for conflict of interest involving the companies developing these crops, research institutions and the agencies responsible for assessing the safety of new crops. And that is exactly what appears to be happening in the case of GM herbicide tolerant wheat.
Hanley says that Monsanto, the company developing Round-up Ready herbicide tolerant wheat, is doing so in consort with Agriculture Canada, which has invested $4 million in the development of the product, according to news reports. If the wheat is approved and goes to market, Agriculture Canada and its research staff will receive about five per cent of sales.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is one of the agencies responsible for ensuring the safety of Roundup Ready wheat. The CFIA is an agency of Agriculture Canada, the department that could benefit from the approval of Roundup Ready wheat.
At the very least, there is a perception of conflict that would make approval of Roundup Ready wheat highly questionable. (And this is one case where it should not occur: GM wheat would be a marketing disaster for Canada.)
Meanwhile, a new study from the U.S. suggests we may have good reason to be concerned about the environmental impacts of GM crops.
One factor thought to favour GM crops is that they are supposed to require less pesticide use than conventional crops. A new U.S. study shows the use of GM crops, such as pest-resistant corn or herbicide-tolerant soybeans, did in fact result in lower pesticide use in the U.S. between 1996 and 1998, the first three years in which GM crops were in use. Pesticide use went down by 25.4 million pounds during this period.
Over the last three years (2001-03), however, things turned around and 73 million more pounds of pesticides were applied on GE crops than would otherwise have been used. The study concludes that the planting of 550 million acres of GM corn, soybeans and cotton in the US since 1996 has actually increased pesticide use by about 50 million pounds.



top

GM trees trigger row at UN climate talks
December 9, 2003
Agence France Presse
MILAN - Diplomats were cited as saying that talks here on a scheme to plant forests that will help offset global warming were foundering Tuesday over whether to include genetically-modified trees in the package.
The row, on the eve of a ministerial gathering of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), focuses on so-called carbon sinks -- forests that would be planted to soak up carbon dioxide (CO2), the biggest greenhouse gas.
The story explains that under the UN's Kyoto Protocol on global warming, rich countries will be able to offset forest-planting in poor countries against their requirements to cut emissions of C02.
Negotiations under way at the December 1-12 UNFCCC meeting here aim at setting down the fine technical details as to how this part of the Protocol will work, such evaluating how much C02 will be stored, the kind of forest that will be planted and the minimum time the "sink" must grow before being harvested.
Diplomats said there was discord over whether these "sinks" planted abroad should only comprise species that are native to the country and whether genetically-modified trees should be allowed into the mix.
GM technology is cautiously spreading out of food crops and one conceivable outlet would be trees whose genes have been engineered to make them grow faster, thus soaking up CO2 more quickly.
However, green groups, which are a powerful force in the European Union, are angrily against any extension of genetic engineering.



top

Farmer leading fight against GM seed to speak in province
December 9, 2003
The Guardian (Charlottetown)
A4
Steve Sharratt
MONTAGUE -- Seventy-two-year-old Percy Schmeiser, the Saskatchewan farmer who is leading the charge against genetically modified seed and biotech giant Monsanto's attempts for patent rights will, according to this story, tour Prince Edward Island and address two upcoming public meetings.
The event is sponsored by the National Farmers Union and the Council of Canadians.
Leo Broderick of the Council of Canadians which is a host sponsor of the visit, was quoted as saying, "While Schmeiser agreed that some of his fields contained Monsanto's GM canola, he also claimed they were contaminated the previous year by pollen from a neighbour's field. The seeds blew off trucks on their way to a nearby canola processing plant."
He speaks in Summerside on Sunday, Dec. 14, at St. Paul's Hall at 2 p.m. and in Charlottetown on Monday, Dec. 15, at 7:30 p.m. at the Basilica Rec Centre.



top

Apron Maxx RTA sets a new standard for pulse and bean seed treatments
December 8, 2003
Syngenta Media Release - Communique aux Media Calgary, Alta.
A revolutionary new seed treatment is about to change the face of Canada's pulse and bean industry. Called Apron Maxx RTA, this new seed treatment has just received approval for use on all of the major pulse and bean crops grown in Canada, including soybeans, dry beans, lentils, dry peas and chickpeas.
"This is a very exciting development for the pulse and bean sector," says Rick Istead, Seed Treatments Crop Manager with Syngenta Crop Protection Canada, Inc., the manufacturer of Apron Maxx RTA. "It is a significant advance for our growers in that Apron Maxx RTA can be used on all of the major pulse and bean crops, controlling the major seed and soil-borne diseases in each of those crops. That's convenience and peace of mind protection all in one package."
Apron Maxx RTA delivers broad spectrum seed and soil-borne disease protection
to pulse and bean growers:
- In soybeans: damping-off and seed rots caused by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and Pythium
- In dry beans (white, dark red kidney, light red kidney and cranberry beans): damping-off caused by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and Pythium and anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum
- In chickpeas: damping-off caused by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and Pythium
- In lentils: seedling blight caused by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and Pythium
- In dry peas (including field peas): seedling blight caused by Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and Pythium.
Apron Maxx RTA is a water-based, ready-to-apply formulation that can be applied on-farm or in commercial treating facilities, says Istead. "It's also inoculant-friendly so growers can treat and inoculate their seed in one operation.
"There is a definite connection between seed treatments and better yields," says Istead. "The more pulse and bean growers can do to help their crops overcome early season diseases and get the best start possible, the better chance they have at gaining higher yields and quality come harvest."
www.syngenta.com.



top

Plant immune system's 'take two aspirin' gene, offers hope for disease control
December 8, 2003
Cornell University News Service
ITHACA, N.Y. -- Scientists have found the gene that sends a signal through plant immune systems, saying, in effect: "Take two aspirin and call out the troops – we're under attack!"
Discovery of the salicylic acid-binding protein 2 (SABP2) gene, by scientists at Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research (BTI) at Cornell University, is being called an important step toward new strategies to boost plants' natural defenses against disease and for reducing the need for agricultural pesticides.
Salicylic acid, the chemical compound found naturally in most plants (as well as in the most-used medication, aspirin), is a plant hormone produced at elevated levels in response to attack by microbial pathogens. According to a report on the Web today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS Early Edition, week of Dec. 7, 2003) by BTI's Dhirendra Kumar and Daniel F. Klessig, the aspirin-like hormone is perceived by the SABP2 protein and a message is transmitted, via a lipid-based signal, to activate the plant's defense arsenal. Says Klessig, "Now that we know a key signaling protein in plant immune systems, we can work on ways to enhance the signal and help plants fight disease without using potentially harmful pesticides."
The PNAS authors say SABP2 plays an important role in restricting infections by inducing host cells at the site of infection to undergo programmed cell death and sacrifice themselves for the benefit of the rest of the plant.
SABP2 also plays a critical role in activating the innate immune system in other parts of the plant to guard against further attack or spread by the same pathogen – and even against unrelated pathogens. (Innate immune systems, which mount an immediate defense against infections, are found in all plants and animals. But only vertebrates, including humans and other mammals, have additional levels of defense – the antibody-producing B cell and T cell-mediated acquired immunity for a delayed response that can take weeks to develop.)
The Klessig laboratory discovered the presence of the SABP2 protein in plants in 1997. But it took five years to purify the protein, which occurs naturally in "excruciatingly small amounts," then to clone the gene that encodes it, and finally to assess the role of SABP2 in disease resistance. The PNAS article tells how the researchers proved that SABP2 is a key player in innate immunity by silencing the SABP2 gene and watching the plant immune system fail.
Although the salicylic acid-signaling experiments were done with tobacco plants – because tobacco is a well-known plant species for studying disease resistance – similar salicylic acid-binding proteins are found in other plant species, the BTI researchers say, making their results applicable to other crop plants.
And the finding might even help immunologists understand evolutionarily related signaling pathways in vertebrates, including humans, according to another BTI researcher and professor of plant pathology at Cornell, Gregory B. Martin. In a 2001 research article, he suggested that some molecular mechanisms involved in innate immunity in mammalian and insect systems "are remarkably similar to the molecular mechanisms underlying plant disease-resistance responses." Innate immunity in all kinds of living things, Martin and his co-authors added, "might be an evolutionarily ancient system of host defense."
When tobacco mosaic virus attacks a tobacco plant, the PNAS authors report, the immediate visible effect of SABP2 is to enable salicylic acid to induce the so-called hypersensitive resistance response. "We see programmed cell death at the site of the attack as plant cells sacrifice themselves for the overall survival of the plant," Klessig explains. "We believe programmed cell death helps restrict the infection to a small part of the plant. Something similar happens in animal systems, when virus-infected cells or cells with defective growth control that could become cancerous undergo programmed cell death," he says, noting that aspirin has been found to have a protective effect against cancer.
Even as the infection is being contained, the plant begins to signal other parts of itself that it is undergoing attack. "This leads to long-lasting, broad-spectrum systemic resistance to infections against the initial attacking pathogen and also against other viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens," Klessig says. "Systemic acquired resistance can last throughout most of the life of an annual plant."
Earlier this year the Klessig research group announced (in the May 16, 2003, issue of the journal Cell) their discovery of a plant gene for nitric oxide synthase, the enzyme that rapidly produces nitric oxide (NO) after infection. This is one of the earliest responses to pathogen attack.
"With nitric oxide synthase and now with SABP2, as well as other defense-signaling pathway components that have already or are sure to be discovered, we are beginning to see some effective and sustainable alternatives to pesticides," Klessig says, suggesting two possible strategies:
Genetic manipulation could enhance a crop plant's ability to make more of a scarce defense-signaling compound or a limiting receptor needed to transmit this signaling compound. Alternatively, crops could be treated with a functional mimic of the signaling compound itself when plant disease is anticipated.
"Either way, we are utilizing and enhancing a plant's own natural defenses," Klessig says. "That should be a better way, both because it will be much more difficult for pathogenic organisms to develop resistance and because we can avoid contaminating the environment."
He adds that an attack by a plant pathogen "marks the start of a war. If the plant can recognize the pathogen and activate its defense arsenal in time, the plant usually wins. But if the pathogen circumvents detection or the defenses themselves, the plant is in trouble. The more we learn about plant immune systems, the better are the chances we can help important crop plants win their war – without the collateral damage from chemical pesticides."



top

EPA orders pest control company to stop selling illegal pesticide
December 8, 2003
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
http://yosemite.epa.gov/r9/r9press.nsf/7f3f954af9cce39b882563fd0063a09c/8b80ad041cfbbe9c88256df6006d2172?OpenDocument
SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with assistance from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, last week ordered the owner of the Diamond Company of Grover Beach, Calif. to immediately stop selling an unregistered pesticide product.
The company owner sold and distributed from its Web site a product called, "Siamon's Mold Control," which was never registered with the EPA. The company made several public health claims that its product eliminated or inactivated mold, bacteria, fungus and viruses. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, the EPA requires products that make these claims to be registered with the agency and provide data proving their effectiveness.
"Without EPA registration, we have no information on the ingredients and possible effects of this product, which could result in harm to public health and the environment," said Enrique Manzanilla, director of the EPA's Cross Media Division for the Pacific Southwest region. "It is the company's responsibility to register its pesticides with the EPA."
If the Diamond Company fails to comply with the EPA order issued on Dec. 4, it will face criminal action or civil fines.
The EPA will not register a pesticide until tests show that it will not pose an unreasonable risk when used according to the directions. The agency also ensures that pesticide labels provide consumers with the information they need to use the products safely. Pesticides that have been registered with the agency will have an EPA registration number on the label.
The EPA's action was based on an investigation of Web sites that sell or distribute illegal or unregistered pesticide products.

top



Agnet is produced by the Food Safety Network at the University of Guelph and is sponsored by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Plants Program at the University of Guelph, Agricultural Adaptation Council (CanAdapt Program), AGCare, Canadian Council of Grocery Distributors, ConAgra Foods, Inc., Pioneer Hi-Bred Limited (Canada), Ag-West Biotech, Inc., Monsanto Canada, Meat and Livestock Australia, National Pork Board, Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Council for Biotechnology Information, Canadian Animal Health Institute, Croplife Canada, Syngenta Seeds Canada, Inc., Canadian Food Information Council, Saskatchewan Agriculture, Food and Rural Revitalization, JIFSAN, National Cattlemen's Beef Association, National Food Processors Association, Ontario Agri-Food Technologies, Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Ltd., BC Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Feedlot Health Management Services, Syngenta Crop Protection, Ontario Corn Producers' Association, DuPont Canada, Inc., Office of Consumer Affairs, Burger King, Sobeys Ontario, McCain Produce Inc., Canadian Institute for Food Inspection and Regulation, Canadian Wheat Board, National Meat Association, Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Ontario Soybean Growers, Bunge, Ltd., UC Davis Biotechnology Program, Consumer Federation of America Foundation, Optibrand, University of Idaho Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Tactix Government Consulting, Inc., Plant Bioscience Ltd., CanAmera Foods, Hospitality Institute of Technology and Management, Inc., Hartono and Company, Agri Business Group, Inc., and Global Public Affairs.

To subscribe to the html version of Agnet (subscription is free), send mail to:
listserv@listserv.uoguelph.ca
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type:
subscribe agnet-L firstname lastname
i.e. subscribe agnet-L Doug Powell
(replace agnet-L with agnettext to subscribe to the text version of agnet)

To unsubscribe to the html version of Agnet, send mail to:
listserv@listserv.uoguelph.ca
leave subject line blank
in the body of the message type:
signoff agnet-L
(replace agnet-L with agnettext to unsubscribe to the text version of agnet)


For more information about the Agnet research program, please contact:
Dr. Douglas Powell
Associate Professor
dept. of plant agriculture
University of Guelph
Guelph, Ont.
N1G 2W1
tel: 519-824-4120 x54280
cell: 519-835-3015
fax: 519-763-8933
dpowell@uoguelph.ca
http://www.foodsafety.ksu.edu

The Food Safety Network's bilingual toll-free line for obtaining food safety
information: 1-866-50-FSNET (1-866-503-7638)



archived at "http://131.104.74.73:96/agnet-archives.htm